Get it now!
Big Five Personality Inventory (NEO PI -R) (Full)
NO.: 3d91cdaa05070142-2024/5/24 0:55:30
Gender: Female, , International Norm
The following report is designed to provide information about five basic dimensions of personality and their corresponding facets. The report is based on research with normal samples and is intended to provide information about the basic dimensions of personality. It is recommended that the results presented in this report be integrated with all other sources of information before making any professional decisions about this individual. It is recommended that decisions should never be based solely on the information contained in this report. This report is confidential and is intended for use only by qualified professionals. It should not be given to the person being assessed.
The following section presents the scores for each factor scale. In addition, the report includes all scale descriptions, item responses, and leadership indices.
【Ⅰ.Big Five Personality Summary Report】
【Ⅱ.N(Neuroticism)】
【Ⅲ.E (Extraversion)】
【Ⅳ.O(Openness)】
【Ⅴ.A(Agreeableness)】
【Ⅵ.C(Conscientiousness)】
【Ⅶ.Profile Stability】
【Ⅷ. Personality Style Graphs】
【Ⅸ.NEO Personal Insight Report: Work Style】
【Ⅹ.Value Applied】
Ⅰ.Big Five Personality Summary Report
BACK
N(Neuroticism)
E(Extraversion)
O(Openness
A(Agreeableness
C(Conscientiousness)
5.7
5.4
4.2
3.9
4
High
Low
N (Neuroticism): This test examines the extent to which an individual is susceptible to psychological stress. It assesses the individual's ability to maintain emotional stability and regulate impulses.
E (Extraversion): This test examines your tendency to seek stimulation from other people.
O (Openness):This test measures your openness to new ideas and your imagination.
A (Agreeableness):This test measures your tendency to be cooperative and compassionate, rather than antagonistic or suspicious.
C (Conscientiousness):This test measures your dependability, self-discipline, and the extent to which you prefer planned behavior to spontaneous action.
Interpretation:♦ Dependable(Highly credible);◊ Changeable(Cautious and trustworthy)
【Personality Traits】
【Professional performance】
【Leadership Skills】
【Intimacy and Conflict Management】
【Team performance】
【How to work with me】
▶Personality Traits
BACK
♦high neuroticism:Emotionally sensitive and volatile, with strong and unstable inner experiences, prone to anxiety and self-blame, and overreacting to stress.
◊medium extraversion:Adaptability is balanced, able to enjoy both socializing and working independently, adjusting activity level according to the environment.
♦low openness:Experience-dependent, valuing traditional methods and certainty, wary of the unknown, preferring regularity.
♦low agreeableness:Results-oriented, they value efficiency and goal achievement. They can be direct in expressing their views, which can lead to conflict. They have a strong competitive spirit.
♦low conscientiousness:Weak in action, lacking in long-term planning, easily disturbed by external factors, and less concerned with rules and commitments.
♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▶Professional performance
BACK
▷The best job for you
✔♦Rule-breaking freelancers (street artists, anarchist event planners, designated drivers) --Unstructured survival experts (digital nomads, extreme sports enthusiasts, outdoor adventure guides) --Instant demand responders (takeout drivers, live streaming hosts, temporary event managers)
Matching Key Points:Adapting to change --Rule Boundary Breaking --Short-term demand satisfaction
✔♦Rule-breaking freelancers (street artists, anarchist event planners, designated drivers) --Unstructured survival experts (digital nomads, extreme sports enthusiasts, outdoor adventure guides) --Responders to immediate needs (food delivery drivers, live streaming hosts, temporary event organizers)
Matching Key Points:Adaptive Survival --Pushing the boundaries of rules --Short-term Demand Satisfaction
✔♦Enforcer of strict rules (judge, traffic cop, tax inspector) --Process mechanization builders (assembly line workers, ATM maintenance personnel, highway toll collectors) --Systemic security maintainers (nuclear power plant operators, missile defense system monitors, national classified file managers)
Matching Key Points:Command chain obedience --Repetitive operations with precision --Absolute compliance
✔♦Unstructured decision makers (startup CEOs, metaverse developers, lab researchers on the texture of artificial meat) --Rule-breaking freelancers (street artists, anarchist event planners, designated drivers)
Matching Key Points:Breaking with conventional ways --Adapt to change
✔♦Independent High-Pressure Executors (emergency surgeons, sky divers, nuclear power plant engineers) --Dedicated technical experts (cybersecurity hackers, quantum physics researchers, gene-editing engineers) --Rule enforcers (judges, traffic cops, drug regulators)
Matching Key Points:★Focus in high-pressure situations --Deep technical expertise --Rigid enforcement of rules
✔♦Independent high-pressure experts (emergency surgeons, sky divers, nuclear power plant engineers) --Focused Emotional Workers (Mental Health Counselors, Hospice Nurses, Art Therapists) --Technical geeks (cybersecurity hackers, quantum physics researchers, cryptography experts)
Matching Key Points:Focus under pressure --Low social need --Technical depth and expertise
✔◊Innovative Disruptor (Tech Product Manager, AI Ethics Advisor, Sustainable Energy Entrepreneur) --Dynamically adaptable professionals (crisis communications specialists, pandemic preparedness commanders, business intelligence analysts) --Highly volatile professions (stock traders, entertainment industry agents, cryptocurrency traders)
Matching Key Points:Quick mood changes
✔◊Functional performers (supply chain directors, hospital operations managers, airport tower controllers) --Rule-following experts (judges, traffic cops, drug regulators) --System security experts (cybersecurity architects, nuclear power plant engineers, national archivists)
Matching Key Points:Cross-departmental collaboration --★Standardized process execution --Design ★Risk Prevention Mechanisms
✔◊Functional executor (supply chain director, hospital operations director, airport tower controller)
Matching Key Points:Interdepartmental collaboration
✔◊Cross-disciplinary integrators (creative directors, science fiction writers, biotechnology researchers) --Rule Breakers (cyberpunk city planners, unconventional art curators, founders of experimental educational institutions) --Free explorers (digital nomads, extreme sports enthusiasts, outdoor adventure guides)
Matching Key Points:Cross-domain knowledge integration --Breaking the rules --Autonomous decision making
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▷The jobs that are the worst fit for you
✖♦Highly rule-dependent positions (judges, auditors in accounting firms, pharmaceutical R&D engineers)
Mismatched Key Points:Weak rule awareness
✖♦Rule-dependent positions (judge, auditor at an accounting firm, pharmaceutical R&D engineer)
Mismatched Key Points:Weak sense of rules
✖♦Highly open creative occupations (artist, programmer)--Unstructured freelance occupations (digital nomad, itinerant writer)
Mismatched Key Points:Lack of humanization --Difficult social integration
✖♦Highly rule-dependent roles (judge, accountant, pharmaceutical R&D engineer)--Long-term planning jobs (climate model forecasters, theoretical physicists on the origin of the universe, paleontologists) --Repetitive, standardized work (subway security guard, library cataloger, telephone customer service)
Mismatched Key Points:weak rule awareness --★★Lack of long-term planning--★★★Poor process stability
✖♦Instant feedback-driven jobs (live streaming hosts, short video directors, game players) --Emotionally intensive occupations (hospice nurse, infant and child counselor, art therapist)
Mismatched Key Points:★★★Insufficient flexibility--Lack of empathy
✖♦Dynamic social roles (journalist, director, event planner)--Positions that require immediate feedback (live streaming anchors, short video directors, game players) --Standardized repetitive work (subway security guard, library cataloger, telephone customer service)
Mismatched Key Points:★Lack of social resources --Insufficient emergency flexibility--Emotionally driven weakness
✖◊Stable jobs (judge, teacher, civil servant)--Low-interaction professionals (cryptographers, paleontologists, astronomers) --Repetitive work (assembly line worker, librarian, telephone customer service)
Mismatched Key Points:Poor emotional stability
✖◊Instant feedback-driven professions (short video directors, game players, delivery drivers) --Unstructured professionals (digital nomads, extreme sports enthusiasts, outdoor adventure guides)
Mismatched Key Points:★Adaptive lag--★Inhibition of innovation
✖◊Highly rigorous technical positions (judge, pharmaceutical regulator)--Repetitive and standardized work (subway security guards, library catalogers)
Mismatched Key Points:Strong rule dependency --Weak long-term planning
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▶Leadership Skills
BACK
▷Advantages
✔♦Strong resource integration capabilities, promoting the achievement of short-term goals
✔♦★Efficient decision maker, good at acting quickly in an environment with few rules --Strong ability to integrate resources, promoting achievement of short-term goals
✔♦Accurate risk prediction --Excellent ability to implement standardization
✔♦Extremely adaptable, able to make quick decisions in emergencies --Strong innovative breakthroughs, not bound by existing rules
✔♦Accurate risk predictor --Highly consistent in enforcing rules
✔♦Strong systematic defense --Good at risk control --Stable performance in a crisis
✔◊Strong crisis response, remaining sensitive under high pressure and quickly identifying risks --Adaptable and flexible, adapting strategies to changes in the environment--
✔◊★Strong risk control skills, suitable for mature companies --Rigorous logic ensures quality of execution
✔◊Consistent implementation standards
✔◊Strong adaptability, able to adjust strategies according to the environment --Excellent ability to integrate resources to meet short-term goals
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▷Weaknesses
✖♦Low interpersonal sensitivity can cause conflict
It is recommended that:Create a "digital process sandbox" to simulate change scenarios
✖♦Low interpersonal sensitivity easily leads to conflict --★Lack of long-term trust
It is recommended that:Create a digital process sandbox to simulate change scenarios --Implement quarterly strategic relaxation days to reduce the need for control
✖♦Hinders organizational change (e.g., digital transformation) --Overly risk-averse, missing opportunities for growth --Conservative management style leads to talent loss
It is recommended that:Develop a roadmap for incremental reform (phased implementation over 3 years) --Encourage digital thinking (e.g. learn AI tools) --Establish a dedicated innovation and failure tolerance zone (independent assessment)
✖♦Tendency to break rules is obvious, and frequent challenges to the system lead to conflict --Low reliability of commitment, easy to give up after short-term goals
It is recommended that:Implement a two-track risk/benefit assessment --Establish a short-term contract system: clearly define requirements for incremental results
✖♦Cold communication style leads to team alienation --Resistance to collaboration creates resource silos --Over-conservatism leads to missed opportunities
It is recommended that:Mandatory team building activities (e.g. monthly informal meetings) --Establish anonymous feedback channels to encourage challenge --Exposure to cross-domain case studies Agile management
✖♦Overly conservative, misses opportunities --Resists technological change --A framework of rules can limit flexibility in solving unexpected problems
It is recommended that:Red-blue confrontation sandbox: the highly open team is forced to propose radical solutions as a pressure test. --Progressive technology penetration: complete training on one low-code innovation tool per year --Fault-tolerant incentive mechanism: Establish a "controlled trial and error budget
✖◊Poor team stability, emotional swings affect morale --Overly self-protective, alienating colleagues--
It is recommended that:Establish an emotional buffer mechanism (regular and honest communication) --Cultivate long-term thinking (keep a diary/mentor to sort out logic)--
✖◊Lack of innovation makes it easy to be eliminated by the market --Overly Rational leads to employee creativity exhaustion
It is recommended that:Introduce "reverse brainstorming" to challenge existing logic --Establish an "innovative error-tolerant budget
✖◊Missed opportunities for change due to clinging to old ways --A depressing team atmosphere stifles vitality --Too risk-averse, leading to burnout
It is recommended that:Organize regular brainstorming sessions to challenge existing rules --Establish a special error tolerance zone (allow 10% of the budget to be used for trial and error) --Cultivate second-tier leaders
✖◊Loose rules lead to higher collaboration costs --Weak long-term trust
It is recommended that:Implement a "lightweight process framework" (such as Agile Scrum) --Implement a "benefit sharing + risk sharing" mechanism
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▶Intimacy and Conflict Management
BACK
▷♦Intimate Relationship Characteristics:Dual low adaptive mode: socially passive and lacks self-discipline, may be challenged for relying on inertia
✖♦Typical Conflict Behavior:Refusing to change the style of the couple's wedding rings and responding to any changes with "This is fine. --Panicking when your partner suggests a trip, but eventually agreeing
✔♦How do you handle conflict?:Habitual avoidance of conflict (e.g., cold war) or setting minimum standards for interaction (e.g., share interesting things every day)
✔♦Cross-Cultural Adaptation:Result-oriented interventions (e.g., sudden completion of household chores) break deadlocks in Eastern cultures. --Contractual relationships (such as signing a commitment to a monthly date) in Western culture to make conflicts explicit
▷♦Intimate Relationship Characteristics:Dual Low Adaptability Mode: Socially passive and lacking in self-discipline, may cause conflict due to habitual dependency
✖♦Typical Conflict Behavior:The couple refuses to change the style of their wedding rings. Respond to any changes with, "That's fine. --Panicked when your partner suggested a travel plan, but eventually gave in
✔♦How do you handle conflict?:Habitual avoidance of conflict (e.g., cold war) or setting minimum standards for interaction (e.g., sharing interesting things every day)
✔♦Cross-Cultural Adaptation:Result-oriented interventions (e.g., sudden completion of household chores) break deadlocks in Eastern cultures --Western culture: Contractual relationships (e.g., signing a commitment to meet every month) make conflicts visible
▷♦Intimate Relationship Characteristics:Dual Conservative Model: passive in social interactions and resistant to change, needs to break the deadlock with the help of "external intervention" (such as sharing a pet)
✖♦Typical Conflict Behavior:The couple refuses to change the style of their wedding rings and responds to all suggestions for change with "This is fine. --Panicked when your partner suggested a travel plan, but eventually agreed and enjoyed the process
✔♦How do you handle conflict?:Use "habitual avoidance" (e.g., changing the subject, cold war) to avoid conflict. Set "minimum interaction standards" (e.g., share an interesting story every day)
✔♦Cross-Cultural Adaptation:In Eastern culture, "passive indifference" is easily labeled as "untrustworthy," and trust must be rebuilt through "results-oriented" actions (such as suddenly finishing chores). --Western culture is consistent with "slow living" values
▷♦Intimate Relationship Characteristics:Internal Consumption Procrastinator: emotionally sensitive and lacking in planning, needs to maintain motivation through "external supervision" (such as setting up a punch card app), but may trigger a trust crisis due to frequent changes
✖♦Typical Conflict Behavior:After arguing about the route and canceling the trip, the partner goes alone the next day and complains that the other partner is "thoughtless. --Stock up on matching couple's outfits using a shopping app, but never wear them together
✔♦How do you handle conflict?:Use "aggressive avoidance" (e.g., slamming the door and refusing to communicate) to avoid responsibility during a conflict, or use "task shifting" (e.g., asking your partner to make a plan) to reduce stress.
✔♦Cross-Cultural Adaptation:In Eastern cultures, trust is restored through "traditional ritual compensation" (e.g., exchanging gifts during festivals). --"Creative time management is appropriate in Western culture (e.g., the Pomodoro technique) to improve efficiency.
▷♦Intimate Relationship Characteristics:The Internal Conflict Controller: Sensitive and resistant to compromise. Must maintain a sense of security through "regularized care" (e.g., setting relationship KPIs), but may trigger resistance due to desire for control
✖♦Typical Conflict Behavior:Sleeps all night because partner didn't initiate contact, and the next day suggests "Love KPI Assessment Form --You record all your partner's behavioral data in Excel, but a disliked microblogging post triggers a cold war.
✔♦How do you handle conflict?:When in conflict, use "aggressive self-defense" (e.g., "You don't care about me at all!") to avoid the issue, or use "task shifting" (e.g., asking your partner to set rules for the relationship) to reduce stress.
✔♦Cross-Cultural Adaptation:In Eastern cultures, "nonverbal commitments" (e.g., writing a handwritten letter home for a partner) are needed to rebuild trust. --Western culture lends itself to "cognitive behavioral therapy" (e.g., recording and refuting negative thoughts)
▷♦Intimate Relationship Characteristics:Emotional Conservative: Resistant to change, emotionally sensitive, and can create a desire for control due to a lack of security
✖♦Typical Conflict Behavior:Because their partner suggested they try a new restaurant, they had a panic attack and insisted on only going to familiar restaurants. --Using a "lock screen password" to control access to your partner's phone
✔♦How do you handle conflict?:In times of conflict, use habitual avoidance (e.g., cold war) to put the issue on hold, and set a minimum emotional commitment (e.g., a daily "I love you").
✔♦Cross-Cultural Adaptation:In Eastern cultures, superficial harmony is maintained through nonverbal obedience. --Valid in Western culture Boundary contracts define personal space.
▷◊◊Intimate Relationship Characteristics:Sensitive social explorer: strong social needs but prone to mood swings, needs to alleviate loneliness through "interest groups" to alleviate loneliness, but may cause a trust crisis due to blurred boundaries
✖◊Typical Conflict Behavior:Flirting with several people at the same time, but demanding absolute loyalty from the partner --Treat your partner coldly due to work pressure, then use sweet words to make amends.
✔◊How do you handle conflict?:Use a "compromise framework" (e.g., "I'll listen to you this time, next time I'll take the lead") to balance giving, or use "humor to defuse" (e.g., self-deprecating "my emotions are like a roller coaster") to reduce tension.
✔◊◊Cross-Cultural Adaptation:In Eastern cultures, transgressions are avoided through "family mediation interventions. --In Western culture, "mindfulness meditation" (e.g., 10 minutes of breathing exercises per day) can be used to stabilize emotions.
▷◊Intimate Relationship Characteristics:A cautious social practitioner: moderately sociable, but prefers familiar surroundings. They need to deal with external changes through "gradual expansion".
✖◊Typical Conflict Behavior:Hesitates to decide on a new wedding ring design because her partner suggests changing the style, and finally compromises and buys a simple model. --Insists on using an old model cell phone and refuses their partner's offer to upgrade their equipment
✔◊How do you handle conflict?:Use "emotional empathy" (e.g., "I know change is hard, but we can take it slow together") to reduce resistance in conflict, and create "flexible space" (e.g., allow your partner to break plans occasionally).
✔◊Cross-Cultural Adaptation:In Eastern cultures, trust needs to be rebuilt through "results orientation" (e.g., suddenly finishing cleaning the house). --In Western culture, it is necessary to transform conflicts through "creative expression" (such as design theme dates).
▷◊Intimate Relationship Characteristics:A Cautious Social Practitioner: Moderately sociable, but prefers familiar surroundings. They need to "gradually expand" to cope with changes in the outside world.
✖◊Typical Conflict Behavior:They are reluctant to change the style of their wedding rings as their partner suggests, and finally compromise on a simple style. --Insists on using an old model cell phone and refuses your partner's offer to upgrade.
✔◊How do you handle conflict?:Use "emotional empathy" (e.g., "I know change is hard, but we can take it slow together") to soften resistance in conflict, and create "flexible space" (e.g., allow your partner to break plans occasionally).
✔◊Cross-Cultural Adaptation:In Eastern culture, trust needs to be rebuilt through "results orientation" (e.g., suddenly finishing cleaning the house). --Western culture needs to transform conflict through creative expression (e.g. design theme dates)
▷◊Intimate Relationship Characteristics:Passive adapter: low sociability but easily frustrated, conformity may lead to repression
✖◊Typical Conflict Behavior:Signing up for an interest class but dropping out halfway through, covering up your true feelings of frustration with the excuse that "you don't want to bother others. --Cancel a trip after the partner's proposed itinerary causes anxiety and insomnia
✔◊How do you handle conflict?:Use a compromise framework in conflict (e.g., "I'll listen this time, next time I'll make a demand") Balance giving and receiving by providing an emotional outlet (e.g., journaling)
✔◊Cross-Cultural Adaptation:Nonverbal care in Eastern culture (such as sending medicinal food) replaces direct confessions. --Western culture applies emotional journaling to externalize inner conflicts
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▶Team performance
BACK
▷Strengths
✔♦Expert role that performs complex tasks independently --Long-term values stabilize the team base
✔♦Independently perform difficult tasks --Extremely rational risk planning
✔♦Independently perform standardized tasks --★Extreme risk aversion --★Long-term values stabilize the team
✔♦Rapid response to unexpected needs --Acts independently to avoid process constraints --Multiple attempts to break convention
✔♦Task-oriented and strong in execution Avoiding emotional interference --Self-directed problem solving to reduce dependency --Encourage process optimization with high standards
✔♦Strong execution skills, strict adherence to established processes --Strong sense of risk aversion to ensure task stability --Experienced in tradition, good at standardized operations
✔◊Flexibility and sensitivity go hand in hand Crisis management Quick reaction --They can balance the need for social interaction with the need for solitude. They have a high stress tolerance. --Multi-angle view of problems and innovative solutions
✔◊Rational risk-benefit analysis --Reliable in performing independent tasks --Avoids groupthink
✔◊Rationally allocates time between social interaction and execution --Solve complex problems independently --★Avoid the risks of group decisions
✔◊Rationally allocate time between socializing and execution --Solves complex problems independently
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▷Weaknesses
✖♦Overconservatism hinders innovation breakthrough --Lack of empathy due to emotional numbness
✖♦★Social barriers limit collaborative effectiveness --Over-conservatism hinders disruptive innovation
✖♦Social barriers limit resource integration --Overly conservative hinders process improvement --★Emotional numbness leads to lack of empathy
✖♦Weak sense of rules leads to deviations in implementation --Low stress tolerance leads to task failure --Lack of long-term planning
✖♦Social indifference creates barriers to collaboration --Over-rationality ignores team morale --Emotional outbursts under pressure undermine collaboration
✖♦Resistance to change hinders process improvement --Emotional issues lead to paranoia about details. --Lack of strategic vision, making it difficult to respond to complex challenges
✖Severe internal friction Self-doubt weakens motivation --Sensitive interpersonal relationships easily lead to conflict. --Repeated revisions lead to inefficiency
✖◊Social passivity leads to missed opportunities for collaboration --Overconservatism hinders process optimization --Stress tolerance limited to routine
✖◊Passivity in social situations leads to missed opportunities for collaboration --★Overly rational thinking dampens team morale --Stress-tolerance limited to routine situations
✖◊Social passivity misses opportunities for cooperation --Stress tolerance limited to the routine
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▶How to work with me
BACK
▷Counseling
✔♦Use short-term goals to drive action (e.g., "finish the framework this week"). --Establish a penalty mechanism to ensure a bottom line (e.g., “Suspend the project if the target is not met”)--Avoid emotional communication
✔♦Set clear goals and reduce intervention (e.g., "just go live by the end of the month")
✔♦Set clear goals and reduce intervention (e.g., "Just go live by the end of the month") --★Use incentives to motivate you (e.g. “Bonus for exceeding expectations”).--★Allow you to choose your own methods (e.g., "you choose the technology")
✔♦Set simple and clear rules (e.g., "Send a daily progress email") --Replace process anxiety with a focus on results (e.g., “First complete the framework and then optimize the details.”)--Allow you to gain a sense of control through fixed processes (e.g., "Just fill out the template").
✔♦Reduce your sense of pressure by setting clear boundaries (e.g., "This is the only way to handle this") --Replace emotional empathy with logical persuasion (e.g. “The data proves that this is a safer approach”).--Allow you to be alone to recover your emotions (e.g., "If you need space, you can always leave.")
✔♦Reinforce a sense of rules to reduce anxiety (e.g., "It's more reassuring to follow the process") --Reassure you with familiar things (e.g. “Let's go through old photos together”)--Provide clear solutions (e.g., "Just follow plan A")
✔◊Lead with a steady rhythm --Allow occasional solitude to restore energy--Pay attention to hidden anxiety
✔◊★Respect your incremental improvements (e.g., "Optimize existing features first") --Convince you to accept change with real-world examples (e.g., “users have reported that this design is easier to use”)--★Keep you motivated with short-term goals (e.g., "Complete three optimizations this month")
✔◊Convince you with real-life examples
✔◊Set bottom-line requirements (e.g., "Functionality must pass testing") --Motivate you to improve efficiency with incentives (e.g. “Bonus for going live on time.”)--Allow you to handle non-critical links flexibly (e.g. "free rein in interface design")
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
▷Behaviors to avoid
✖♦Overly expecting your cooperation (e.g., "Just do what I want.") --Obsessing over details (e.g., "This layout is wrong, do it again!") --Criticizing the process while ignoring the result
✖♦Criticizing your casual attitude (e.g., "This solution is sloppy.") --Frequent checks on progress (e.g., "Report back every day.") --Create a sense of urgency (e.g. "need to go live next week")
✖♦Criticizes your casual attitude (e.g., "This solution is too hasty.") --Check progress too often (e.g., "Report back every day.") --Creating a sense of urgency (e.g., "It has to go live next week!")
✖♦Forcing the addition of complex tasks (e.g., "Add three more features.") --Criticizing your carelessness (e.g., "Such a simple mistake?") --Creating unpredictable changes (e.g., "We may change direction next week.")
✖♦Forcing you to compromise (e.g., "you have to agree") --Emotionally confront your assertiveness (e.g., "You're really hard to get along with") --Ignoring your potential fears (e.g., "What's there to worry about?")
✖♦Forcing you to change your habits (e.g., "You have to try this new tool!") --Denying your past experiences (e.g., "You were wrong before.") --Making sudden changes (e.g. "change of plans")
✖◊Forcing intense social interaction --Direct questioning of silence --Stoking Your Competitive Instinct
✖◊★Criticizing your conservatism (e.g., "You're always standing still") --Interrupting you when you are concentrating on your work to bring up unrelated topics (e.g., "Look at that gossip!") --Create unpredictable changes to the task (e.g., "We made a last-minute adjustment to the plan.")
✖◊Frequently interrupts your concentration --Create unpredictable changes in assignments
✖◊Criticize your procrastination (e.g. "Still no progress after all this time?") --Imposing additional rules and restrictions (e.g., "You must write your documents according to the template.") --Ignoring your practical difficulties (e.g., "Don't do it if you don't have enough resources")
★:Important ♦:Dependable ◊:Changeable
Ⅱ.N(Neuroticism):5.7 ——High
BACK
Description of high scores: Those with high scores are reactive and tend to react to most situations in an alert, sensitive, concerned, attentive, excitable, or expressive manner. Under stress, they may appear anxious, tense, restless, depressed, easily discouraged, temperamental, or worried. When times are tough, they need time to vent their frustrations or alleviate their concerns before they are ready to tackle the next professional challenge. They can serve as the conscience or emotional barometer for their team or organization.
Description of Average Scores: This person is responsive and tends to be calm, secure and steady under normal circumstances. They also have a moderate threshold for dealing with stress in the workplace.
Description of low scores: Individuals with high levels of resilience tend to respond to stressful situations in a calm, confident, and rational manner. They are typically stress-free, guilt-free, and impulse-resistant. Unless they are very attentive, they may appear to others to be too laid back and relaxed. Others may even perceive them as uncaring, lethargic, insensitive, or unaware of problems. In order to foster positive working relationships, it may be necessary to take others' concerns more seriously.
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
N6
5.2
6
6.6
5.3
5
5.2
High
Low
N1(ANXIETY)5.2——Average
People with elevated anxiety levels are prone to feelings of apprehension, fear, worry, nervousness, tension, and jitteriness. The scale does not directly assess specific fears or phobias, but individuals with high scores are more likely to experience such fears as well as generalized anxiety.
Those with low scores tend to exhibit calm and relaxed behavior, with a tendency to avoid dwelling on potential negative outcomes.
N2(ANGRY HOSTILITY)6 ——High
Angry hostility represents the tendency to experience anger and related states such as frustration and bitterness. This scale measures the individual's willingness to experience anger; whether the anger is expressed depends on the individual's level of agreeableness. It should be noted, however, that unpleasant people often score high on this scale.
Low scorers are easygoing and slow to get angry.
N3(DEPRESSION)6.6 ——High
This scale is designed to assess individual differences in the tendency to experience depressive affect. High scorers are prone to feelings of guilt, sadness, hopelessness, and loneliness. They are easily discouraged and often depressed.
Low scorers rarely experience such emotions, but they are not necessarily cheerful and upbeat. Instead, these traits are more often associated with extraversion.
N4(SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS)5.3——Average
Emotions of shame and embarrassment form the core of this facet of neuroticism. Those who are self-conscious are uncomfortable around others, sensitive to ridicule, and prone to feelings of inferiority. Self-consciousness is related to shyness and social anxiety.
Those who score low on this dimension do not necessarily have poise or good social skills; they are simply less bothered by uncomfortable social situations.
N5(IMPULSIVITY)5——Average
Impulsivity is defined as the inability to control cravings and urges. Desires, such as those for food, cigarettes, or possessions, are perceived as so strong that the individual is unable to resist them, even though they may later regret the behavior.
Low scorers find it easier to resist such temptations and have a high tolerance for frustration. It is important to note that the Impulsivity facet should not be confused with spontaneity, risk-taking, or quick decision-making.
N6(VULNERABILITY)5.2——Average
Those who score high on this scale are unable to cope with stress and become dependent, hopeless, or panicked when faced with emergency situations.
In contrast, those who score low perceive themselves as capable of handling difficult situations.
Ⅲ.E (Extraversion) :5.4——Average
BACK
A description of high scores indicates that the individual prefers social interaction and tends to be outgoing, enthusiastic, sociable, and fun-loving. They often take on a leadership role, either formally or informally. However, they may not be good listeners, as they often dominate conversations.
Description of average scores: Those in the middle of the scale tend to move easily between collaborative and independent work. They have a moderate tolerance for sensory stimulation, which can eventually become tiresome.
The low scores can be described as follows: Individuals who are introverted may prefer to work alone. These individuals may be seen by others as serious, quiet, and private. They may prefer to write or email rather than talk to others. They may be perceived by others as loners.
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
4.8
4.3
5.7
5.6
6.3
4.8
High
Low
E1(WARMTH)4.8——Average
Warmth is the facet of extraversion that is most relevant to issues of interpersonal intimacy. Individuals who score high on the warmth scale are characterized by an affectionate and friendly demeanor. They tend to form close bonds with others and genuinely like people.
Those who score low on the warmth scale are neither hostile nor necessarily lacking in compassion. However, they are more formal, reserved, and distant than those who score high.
E2(GREGARIOUSNESS)4.3——Low
Those who score high on this scale are gregarious and enjoy the company of others.
In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to be loners who do not seek or actively avoid social stimulation.
E3(ASSERTIVENESS)5.7 ——High
Those who score highest on this aspect of the test are characterized by a dominant, forceful, and socially ascendant demeanor. They are able to speak without hesitation and often assume a leadership role within a group.
In contrast, those who score lowest on this aspect of the test tend to stay in the background and allow others to take the lead in discussions.
E4(ACTIVITY)5.6 ——High
People with high Activity scores tend to move quickly and energetically, have a sense of energy, and feel the need to keep busy.
In contrast, those with low scores tend to lead a more leisurely and relaxed lifestyle, although they are not necessarily sluggish or lazy.
E5(EXCITEMENT SEEKER)6.3 ——High
Those who score high on this scale are characterized by a need for excitement and stimulation. They tend to be attracted to bright colors and noisy environments. Excitement seeking is analogous to some aspects of sensation seeking.
Those who score low on this scale show a minimal need for thrills and a preference for a lifestyle that high scorers may find uninspiring.
E6(POSITIVE EMOTIONS)4.8——Average
The final aspect of extraversion is the tendency to experience positive emotions, including joy, happiness, love, and excitement. Individuals with high scores on this dimension tend to laugh easily and often, and display a cheerful and optimistic demeanor.
In contrast, those with low scores on this dimension are not necessarily unhappy; they simply exhibit less exuberance and high spirits.
Ⅳ.O(Openness):4.2——Low
BACK
A description of high scores on the test indicates that the individual tends to have a wide range of interests and a tendency to be at the forefront of innovation. They are often curious, introspective and reflective, seeking new experiences and thinking about the future. They may also be prone to boredom. Others may find them impractical or unrealistic.
Average scores indicate that they tend to have a somewhat down-to-earth disposition, although they are open to considering new approaches if convinced. They are not known for their creativity or curiosity, but they do appreciate innovation and efficiency.
Description of low scores: Those who score low on this personality factor are practical and down-to-earth. They approach work with efficiency and are comfortable with repetitive activities. Others may see them as conservative, narrow in their thinking, set in their ways, or even rigid.
O1
O2
O3
O4
O5
O6
4.2
5.1
4.4
4.7
5.4
2.7
High
Low
O1(FANTASY)4.2——Low
Those who are open to fantasy are characterized by a vivid imagination and an active fantasy life. They engage in daydreaming not simply as an escape, but as a means of creating an interesting inner world for themselves. They elaborate and develop their fantasies and believe that imagination contributes to a rich and creative life.
Those with lower scores are more prosaic and prefer to keep their minds on the task at hand.
O2(AESTHETICS)5.1——Average
Those who score highest on this scale show a deep appreciation for art and beauty. They are moved by poetry, absorbed by music, and fascinated by art. While they may not possess artistic talent or even what is commonly considered good taste, their interest in the arts often leads them to develop a broader knowledge and appreciation than the average person.
Individuals who score low on the Aesthetics scale may not have a strong inclination toward art and beauty. They may not be as emotionally affected by poetry, as engaged by music, or as fascinated by the visual arts as those with higher scores. This doesn't necessarily mean that they lack an appreciation for the arts; it could simply indicate that their interests and passions lie elsewhere. Their understanding and knowledge of artistic fields may be more limited, reflecting a preference for practical or utilitarian aspects of life over artistic pursuits.
O3(EMOTIONS)4.4——Low
Those who score high on the Openness to Feelings scale are more receptive to their own inner feelings and emotions and tend to view emotions as an important aspect of life. They experience deeper and more nuanced emotional states and feel both happiness and unhappiness more intensely than those with lower scores.
Those with lower scores tend to have more subdued affect and do not believe that emotional states are very important.
O4(ACTIONS)4.7——Average
The behavioral indicator of openness is demonstrated by a willingness to engage in novel activities, explore new environments, and consume unconventional foods. People who score high on this scale tend to value novelty and variety over familiarity and routine. They may take up a number of different hobbies over time.
In contrast, people who score low on this scale find change challenging and tend to stick with what is familiar.
O5(IDEAS)5.4——Average
Intellectual curiosity is a long-recognized aspect of Openness. This trait is evidenced by an active pursuit of intellectual interests for their own sake, as well as an open-mindedness and willingness to consider new, perhaps unconventional, ideas. High scorers on this scale enjoy both philosophical arguments and brain teasers. Openness to ideas does not necessarily imply high intelligence, although it may contribute to the development of intellectual potential.
Those who score low on this scale show limited curiosity. If they are highly intelligent, they tend to focus their resources on a limited number of topics.
O6(VALUES)2.7——Low
The Openness to Values scale measures an individual's willingness to examine social, political, and religious values. Individuals who score low on this scale tend to accept authority and honor tradition, and as a result are generally conservative, regardless of political party affiliation.
In contrast, individuals who score high on this scale can be considered the opposite of dogmatic.
Ⅴ.(A) Agreeableness:3.9——Low
BACK
A description of high scores suggests that those who achieve them tend to relate to authority figures in a manner that is tolerant, humble, and accepting. This can lead to perceptions of naivete, submissiveness, conflict avoidance, and even unprincipled behavior as the individual tends to give up their position.
A description of the average scores is as follows. It is possible to shift between competitive and cooperative situations, and it is usually possible to adopt a win-win strategy.
A low score on this test indicates that the subject relates to authority figures in a skeptical, harsh, cautious, persistent, and competitive manner. This may cause the subject to appear hostile, rude, self-centered, or combative.
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
4.1
3.1
4.2
4.5
4.9
5.6
High
Low
A1(TRUST)4.1——Low
Those who score high on this scale tend to believe that others are honest and well-intentioned. In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to be cynical and skeptical, assuming that others may be dishonest or dangerous.
A2(STRAIGHTFORWARDNESS)3.1——Low
Those who score high on this scale are open, honest, and straightforward. Those who score low on this scale are more likely to manipulate others through flattery, cunning, or deception. They view these tactics as necessary social skills and may view more straightforward people as naive.
Those with low scores on this scale are more likely to engage in deceptive or evasive behaviors, such as stretching the truth or being reluctant to express their true feelings. However, this should not be interpreted to mean that they are inherently dishonest or manipulative individuals.
A3(ALTRUISM)4.2——Low
Those who score high on the Altruism scale demonstrate an active concern for the welfare of others, as evidenced by their generosity, concern for others, and willingness to help those in need.
In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to be more self-centered and reluctant to become involved in the problems of others.
A4(COMPLIANCE)4.5——Average
This aspect of agreeableness relates to typical responses to interpersonal conflict. Individuals high in agreeableness tend to defer to others, inhibit aggression, and forgive and forget.
Individuals who score high on this dimension are characterized by docility and mildness.
In contrast, those who score low on agreeableness are aggressive, prefer to compete rather than cooperate, and do not hesitate to express anger when necessary.
A5(MODESTY)4.9——Average
Those who score highest on this scale are characterized by a modest and reserved demeanor, although they do not necessarily lack self-confidence or self-esteem.
Those who score lowest on this scale tend to believe themselves to be superior individuals and may be perceived by others as conceited or arrogant.
A6(TENDERNESS)5.6 ——High
This facet scale measures attitudes of compassion and concern for others. High scorers are emotionally moved by the needs of others and emphasize the human side of social policy.
Low scorers are more detached and less emotionally affected by sympathetic appeals to pity. They would consider themselves realists who make rational decisions based on cold logic.
Ⅵ.C(Conscientiousness):4——Low
BACK
A description of High Scorers might be as follows: High Scorers typically work toward goals in a disciplined and reliable manner. They proceed in a linear and sequential manner with a strong will to achieve. They typically consolidate their time, energy, and resources in pursuit of their goals.
Description of Average Scores: Individuals are able to maintain a balance between work demands and personal needs. They are also able to switch from focused activities to spontaneous distractions.
Description of Low Scorers: Low scorers tend to approach goals in a relaxed, spontaneous, open manner. Their minds can switch tracks on a dime. They may be seen as procrastinators or as people who are casual or disorganized in their responsibilities.
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
4.7
3.9
4.4
5.1
3.8
4
High
Low
C1(COMPETENCE)4.7——Average
The concept of competence can be defined as a sense of being capable, reasonable, prudent, and effective. Those who score high on this scale tend to feel well prepared to deal with life's challenges.
In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to have a low opinion of their abilities and admit that they are often unprepared and inept.
C2(ORDER)3.9——Low
Those who score highest on this scale are characterized by neatness, orderliness, and the ability to maintain order. They are able to keep their things in their proper places.
Those who score lowest are unable to organize themselves and describe themselves as lacking in method.
C3(DUTIFULNESS)4.4——Low
Those who score highest on this scale adhere strictly to their ethical principles and scrupulously fulfill their moral obligations as they understand them.
Those who score lowest are more casual about such matters and may be somewhat untrustworthy or unreliable.
C4(STRIVING FOR ACHIEVEMENT)5.1——Average
Those who score high on this facet have high standards and work diligently to achieve their goals. They are meticulous and purposeful and have a sense of direction in life. However, those who score very high may invest too much in their careers and become workaholics.
Those who score low are apathetic and may even be considered lazy. They lack ambition and may appear aimless, but they are often perfectly happy with their low level of achievement.
C5(SELF-DISCIPLINE)3.8——Low
Those with high scores are able to initiate tasks and persevere to completion, regardless of boredom or other distractions. They are able to motivate themselves to complete the task at hand.
Those with low scores tend to procrastinate in beginning tasks and are easily discouraged and eager to quit.
C6(DELIBERATION)4——Low
The act of deliberation indicates a tendency to think carefully and deliberately before acting. Those with high levels of deliberation are typically characterized by a cautious and deliberate approach to decision making.
Conversely, those with low levels of deliberation are often hasty in their actions and often speak or act without fully considering the potential consequences of their actions. At best, people with low levels of deliberation are able to act spontaneously and make quick decisions when necessary.
Ⅶ.Profile Stability
BACK
The available evidence suggests that an individual's personality profile is likely to remain stable throughout adulthood. Barring catastrophic stress, major illness, or therapeutic intervention, this description is likely to serve as a fair guide even into old age.
Ⅷ. Personality Style Graphs
BACK
Broad personality factors exert pervasive influences on thoughts, feelings, and actions. Combinations of factors provide insight into important aspects of people's lives and define what can be called personality styles. For example, psychologists have known for many years that interpersonal interactions can be conceptualized in terms of a circular order, or circumplex, defined by the two axes of Dominance and Love, or the alternative axes of Extraversion and Agreeableness. These two factors define an interaction style.
The nine other factor pairs also define styles, and all ten are represented in the NEO Style graphs. In each graph, there is a red right-angled triangle, and the angle triangle represents the respondent's position, where the vertices are located. The description of the quadrant is then applied to the respondent.
1.If the horizontal side of the triangle is a considerable distance from the green square, the description can be considered the most accurate.
2.If the triangle is entirely within the green square, no specific description is applicable.
3.If the horizontal axis is close to the horizontal or vertical axes, the description of the quadrants of the axis is applicable.
Well-Being Style
N+E+
Overly emotional
These individuals experience a full range of emotions, including both positive and negative feelings, and may switch rapidly between moods. Their interpersonal interactions can be tumultuous because they tend to be easily influenced by their emotions. They may exhibit characteristics of Histrionic Personality Disorder, but they may also find their lives exciting.
Defense Style
N+O-
Maladaptive
Those who exhibit maladaptive behaviors tend to use primitive and ineffective defenses such as repression, denial, and response formation. They tend to avoid contemplating distressing ideas and may also refuse to acknowledge potential dangers, such as a serious illness. They lack insight into the distressing affects they experience and may therefore be considered alexithymic.
Anger Control Style
N+A-
Temperamental
Individuals with a volatile temperament are prone to anger and tend to express it directly. They may become enraged over minor irritations and experience prolonged periods of anger. They are deeply invested in their own emotions and are quick to take offense, often failing to consider the impact of their anger on others. They may engage in physical aggression or verbal abuse.
Impulse Control Style
N+C-
Undercontrolled
These individuals often show a lack of self-control, especially in the face of strong urges or desires. They often find it difficult to resist these urges, resulting in actions that may not be in their long-term best interest. Substance abuse and other health risk behaviors are especially common in this group.
Interest Style
E+O-
Mainstream Consumer
Their interests align with those of the general public and include a range of activities such as social gatherings, sporting events, shopping, and watching popular movies. They are drawn to work environments that allow them to collaborate with others on straightforward tasks. A potential career path for this individual could be that of a salesperson.
Interaction Style
E+A-
Leaders
These individuals derive pleasure from social interactions and see them as opportunities to demonstrate their abilities. They tend to prefer giving direction to receiving it and believe they are particularly adept at making decisions. While they may exhibit a tendency toward bravado and vanity, they also possess the ability to motivate and coordinate the efforts of others.
Activity Style
E+C-
Fun-loving
They are characterized by high levels of energy and vitality, but find it difficult to direct their energy in constructive ways. Instead, they tend to prioritize experiences that offer excitement, adventure, and a lively social environment. They tend to act spontaneously and impulsively, often prioritizing immediate gratification over long-term commitments.
Attitude Style
O-A-
Resolute Believers
These individuals hold firm beliefs about social policy and personal morality. Their view of human nature is characterized by considerable skepticism, which informs their support for strict discipline and a confrontational approach to social problems. They expect adherence to established norms.
Learning Style
O-C-
Reluctant Scholar
It is obvious that academic and intellectual pursuits are not their strength or preference. It is therefore necessary to provide them with special incentives to initiate and maintain their commitment to learning. They may need help organizing their work and setting reminders to ensure they stay on schedule. They are also likely to have difficulty sustaining their attention.
Character Style
A-C-
Undistinguished
People with this personality type are more concerned with their own comfort and pleasure than with the well-being of others. They tend to be weak-willed and are likely to have some undesirable habits that they find difficult to correct.
Ⅸ.NEO Personal Insight Report: Work Style
BACK
The analysis of the results is divided into four main sections: "Problem Solving and Decision Making," "Planning, Organizing and Implementing," "How You Relate to Others," and "Personal Style.
⑴Problem Solving and Decision Making
This section examines your approach to problem solving and decision making. The questionnaire you completed does not assess your intellectual power (in other words, it does not assess your mental ability, or IQ as it is sometimes called), but it does provide insights into how you approach problem solving and decision making. In other words, it is about your thinking style.
①Effectiveness at organizing thoughts
C2
C5
C6
3.9
3.8
4
High
Low
C2(ORDER)3.9——Low
Those who score highest on this scale are characterized by neatness, orderliness, and the ability to maintain order. They are able to keep their things in their proper places.
Those who score lowest are unable to organize themselves and describe themselves as lacking in method.
C5(SELF-DISCIPLINE)3.8——Low
Those with high scores are able to initiate tasks and persevere to completion, regardless of boredom or other distractions. They are able to motivate themselves to complete the task at hand.
Those with low scores tend to procrastinate in beginning tasks and are easily discouraged and eager to quit.
C6(DELIBERATION)4——Low
The act of deliberation indicates a tendency to think carefully and deliberately before acting. Those with high levels of deliberation are typically characterized by a cautious and deliberate approach to decision making.
Conversely, those with low levels of deliberation are often hasty in their actions and often speak or act without fully considering the potential consequences of their actions. At best, people with low levels of deliberation are able to act spontaneously and make quick decisions when necessary.
②Openness and originality
O5
O1
O3
O4
5.4
4.2
4.4
4.7
High
Low
O5(IDEAS)5.4——Average
Intellectual curiosity is a long-recognized aspect of Openness. This trait is evidenced by an active pursuit of intellectual interests for their own sake, as well as an open-mindedness and willingness to consider new, perhaps unconventional, ideas. High scorers on this scale enjoy both philosophical arguments and brain teasers. Openness to ideas does not necessarily imply high intelligence, although it may contribute to the development of intellectual potential.
Those who score low on this scale show limited curiosity. If they are highly intelligent, they tend to focus their resources on a limited number of topics.
O1(FANTASY)4.2——Low
Those who are open to fantasy are characterized by a vivid imagination and an active fantasy life. They engage in daydreaming not simply as an escape, but as a means of creating an interesting inner world for themselves. They elaborate and develop their fantasies and believe that imagination contributes to a rich and creative life.
Those with lower scores are more prosaic and prefer to keep their minds on the task at hand.
O3(EMOTIONS)4.4——Low
Those who score high on the Openness to Feelings scale are more receptive to their own inner feelings and emotions and tend to view emotions as an important aspect of life. They experience deeper and more nuanced emotional states and feel both happiness and unhappiness more intensely than those with lower scores.
Those with lower scores tend to have more subdued affect and do not believe that emotional states are very important.
O4(ACTIONS)4.7——Average
The behavioral indicator of openness is demonstrated by a willingness to engage in novel activities, explore new environments, and consume unconventional foods. People who score high on this scale tend to value novelty and variety over familiarity and routine. They may take up a number of different hobbies over time.
In contrast, people who score low on this scale find change challenging and tend to stick with what is familiar.
③Confidence in solving problems
E3
C1
5.7
4.7
High
Low
E3(ASSERTIVENESS)5.7 ——High
Those who score highest on this aspect of the test are characterized by a dominant, forceful, and socially ascendant demeanor. They are able to speak without hesitation and often assume a leadership role within a group.
In contrast, those who score lowest on this aspect of the test tend to stay in the background and allow others to take the lead in discussions.
C1(COMPETENCE)4.7——Average
The concept of competence can be defined as a sense of being capable, reasonable, prudent, and effective. Those who score high on this scale tend to feel well prepared to deal with life's challenges.
In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to have a low opinion of their abilities and admit that they are often unprepared and inept.
⑵Planning, organizing and implementing
This section examines how you determine and implement action plans.
①Action Orientation
E4
C4
N2
A4
5.6
5.1
6
4.5
High
Low
E4(ACTIVITY)5.6 ——High
People with high Activity scores tend to move quickly and energetically, have a sense of energy, and feel the need to keep busy.
In contrast, those with low scores tend to lead a more leisurely and relaxed lifestyle, although they are not necessarily sluggish or lazy.
C4(STRIVING FOR ACHIEVEMENT)5.1——Average
Those who score high on this facet have high standards and work diligently to achieve their goals. They are meticulous and purposeful and have a sense of direction in life. However, those who score very high may invest too much in their careers and become workaholics.
Those who score low are apathetic and may even be considered lazy. They lack ambition and may appear aimless, but they are often perfectly happy with their low level of achievement.
N2(ANGRY HOSTILITY)6 ——High
Angry hostility represents the tendency to experience anger and related states such as frustration and bitterness. This scale measures the individual's willingness to experience anger; whether the anger is expressed depends on the individual's level of agreeableness. It should be noted, however, that unpleasant people often score high on this scale.
Low scorers are easygoing and slow to get angry.
A4(COMPLIANCE)4.5——Average
This aspect of agreeableness relates to typical responses to interpersonal conflict. Individuals high in agreeableness tend to defer to others, inhibit aggression, and forgive and forget.
Individuals who score high on this dimension are characterized by docility and mildness.
In contrast, those who score low on agreeableness are aggressive, prefer to compete rather than cooperate, and do not hesitate to express anger when necessary.
②Conscientiousness
C5
C3
N5
3.8
4.4
5
High
Low
C5(SELF-DISCIPLINE)3.8——Low
Those with high scores are able to initiate tasks and persevere to completion, regardless of boredom or other distractions. They are able to motivate themselves to complete the task at hand.
Those with low scores tend to procrastinate in beginning tasks and are easily discouraged and eager to quit.
C3(DUTIFULNESS)4.4——Low
Those who score highest on this scale adhere strictly to their ethical principles and scrupulously fulfill their moral obligations as they understand them.
Those who score lowest are more casual about such matters and may be somewhat untrustworthy or unreliable.
N5(IMPULSIVITY)5——Average
Impulsivity is defined as the inability to control cravings and urges. Desires, such as those for food, cigarettes, or possessions, are perceived as so strong that the individual is unable to resist them, even though they may later regret the behavior.
Low scorers find it easier to resist such temptations and have a high tolerance for frustration. It is important to note that the Impulsivity facet should not be confused with spontaneity, risk-taking, or quick decision-making.
③Openness to options and alternatives
O5
O1
O2
O6
5.4
4.2
5.1
2.7
High
Low
O5(IDEAS)5.4——Average
Intellectual curiosity is a long-recognized aspect of Openness. This trait is evidenced by an active pursuit of intellectual interests for their own sake, as well as an open-mindedness and willingness to consider new, perhaps unconventional, ideas. High scorers on this scale enjoy both philosophical arguments and brain teasers. Openness to ideas does not necessarily imply high intelligence, although it may contribute to the development of intellectual potential.
Those who score low on this scale show limited curiosity. If they are highly intelligent, they tend to focus their resources on a limited number of topics.
O1(FANTASY)4.2——Low
Those who are open to fantasy are characterized by a vivid imagination and an active fantasy life. They engage in daydreaming not simply as an escape, but as a means of creating an interesting inner world for themselves. They elaborate and develop their fantasies and believe that imagination contributes to a rich and creative life.
Those with lower scores are more prosaic and prefer to keep their minds on the task at hand.
O2(AESTHETICS)5.1——Average
Those who score highest on this scale show a deep appreciation for art and beauty. They are moved by poetry, absorbed by music, and fascinated by art. While they may not possess artistic talent or even what is commonly considered good taste, their interest in the arts often leads them to develop a broader knowledge and appreciation than the average person.
Individuals who score low on the Aesthetics scale may not have a strong inclination toward art and beauty. They may not be as emotionally affected by poetry, as engaged by music, or as fascinated by the visual arts as those with higher scores. This doesn't necessarily mean that they lack an appreciation for the arts; it could simply indicate that their interests and passions lie elsewhere. Their understanding and knowledge of artistic fields may be more limited, reflecting a preference for practical or utilitarian aspects of life over artistic pursuits.
O6(VALUES)2.7——Low
The Openness to Values scale measures an individual's willingness to examine social, political, and religious values. Individuals who score low on this scale tend to accept authority and honor tradition, and as a result are generally conservative, regardless of political party affiliation.
In contrast, individuals who score high on this scale can be considered the opposite of dogmatic.
⑶Style of relating to others
This section examines the way individuals interact with others, including both their emotional orientation toward others and the role they assume in interpersonal relationships. No value judgments are made about styles of working with others. It is recognized that a style that is beneficial in one context may be detrimental in another. It is up to the individual to reflect on how their style affects the quality of their relationships in their current life situation.
①Social Energy
E1
E2
E3
N4
4.8
4.3
5.7
5.3
High
Low
E1(WARMTH)4.8——Average
Warmth is the facet of extraversion that is most relevant to issues of interpersonal intimacy. Individuals who score high on the warmth scale are characterized by an affectionate and friendly demeanor. They tend to form close bonds with others and genuinely like people.
Those who score low on the warmth scale are neither hostile nor necessarily lacking in compassion. However, they are more formal, reserved, and distant than those who score high.
E2(GREGARIOUSNESS)4.3——Low
Those who score high on this scale are gregarious and enjoy the company of others.
In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to be loners who do not seek or actively avoid social stimulation.
E3(ASSERTIVENESS)5.7 ——High
Those who score highest on this aspect of the test are characterized by a dominant, forceful, and socially ascendant demeanor. They are able to speak without hesitation and often assume a leadership role within a group.
In contrast, those who score lowest on this aspect of the test tend to stay in the background and allow others to take the lead in discussions.
N4(SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS)5.3——Average
Emotions of shame and embarrassment form the core of this facet of neuroticism. Those who are self-conscious are uncomfortable around others, sensitive to ridicule, and prone to feelings of inferiority. Self-consciousness is related to shyness and social anxiety.
Those who score low on this dimension do not necessarily have poise or good social skills; they are simply less bothered by uncomfortable social situations.
②Attitude towards others
A6
A3
A1
A2
5.6
4.2
4.1
3.1
High
Low
A6(TENDERNESS)5.6 ——High
This facet scale measures attitudes of compassion and concern for others. High scorers are emotionally moved by the needs of others and emphasize the human side of social policy.
Low scorers are more detached and less emotionally affected by sympathetic appeals to pity. They would consider themselves realists who make rational decisions based on cold logic.
A3(ALTRUISM)4.2——Low
Those who score high on the Altruism scale demonstrate an active concern for the welfare of others, as evidenced by their generosity, concern for others, and willingness to help those in need.
In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to be more self-centered and reluctant to become involved in the problems of others.
A1(TRUST)4.1——Low
Those who score high on this scale tend to believe that others are honest and well-intentioned. In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to be cynical and skeptical, assuming that others may be dishonest or dangerous.
A2(STRAIGHTFORWARDNESS)3.1——Low
Those who score high on this scale are open, honest, and straightforward. Those who score low on this scale are more likely to manipulate others through flattery, cunning, or deception. They view these tactics as necessary social skills and may view more straightforward people as naive.
Those with low scores on this scale are more likely to engage in deceptive or evasive behaviors, such as stretching the truth or being reluctant to express their true feelings. However, this should not be interpreted to mean that they are inherently dishonest or manipulative individuals.
③Quality of relationships
A4
E3
A5
C1
4.5
5.7
4.9
4.7
High
Low
A4(COMPLIANCE)4.5——Average
This aspect of agreeableness relates to typical responses to interpersonal conflict. Individuals high in agreeableness tend to defer to others, inhibit aggression, and forgive and forget.
Individuals who score high on this dimension are characterized by docility and mildness.
E3(ASSERTIVENESS)5.7 ——High
Those who score highest on this aspect of the test are characterized by a dominant, forceful, and socially ascendant demeanor. They are able to speak without hesitation and often assume a leadership role within a group.
In contrast, those who score lowest on this aspect of the test tend to stay in the background and allow others to take the lead in discussions.
A5(MODESTY)4.9——Average
Those who score highest on this scale are characterized by a modest and reserved demeanor, although they do not necessarily lack self-confidence or self-esteem.
Those who score lowest on this scale tend to believe themselves to be superior individuals and may be perceived by others as conceited or arrogant.
C1(COMPETENCE)4.7——Average
The concept of competence can be defined as a sense of being capable, reasonable, prudent, and effective. Those who score high on this scale tend to feel well prepared to deal with life's challenges.
In contrast, those who score low on this scale tend to have a low opinion of their abilities and admit that they are often unprepared and inept.
⑷Personal Style
Each individual has a distinctive emotional profile that is reflected in his or her personality. The purpose of this section is to examine the subject's emotional landscape and general outlook on life.
①Level of emotionality
O3
N5
C5
E5
4.4
5
3.8
6.3
High
Low
O3(EMOTIONS)4.4——Low
Those who score high on the Openness to Feelings scale are more receptive to their own inner feelings and emotions and tend to view emotions as an important aspect of life. They experience deeper and more nuanced emotional states and feel both happiness and unhappiness more intensely than those with lower scores.
Those with lower scores tend to have more subdued affect and do not believe that emotional states are very important.
N5(IMPULSIVITY)5——Average
Impulsivity is defined as the inability to control cravings and urges. Desires, such as those for food, cigarettes, or possessions, are perceived as so strong that the individual is unable to resist them, even though they may later regret the behavior.
Low scorers find it easier to resist such temptations and have a high tolerance for frustration. It is important to note that the Impulsivity facet should not be confused with spontaneity, risk-taking, or quick decision-making.
C5(SELF-DISCIPLINE)3.8——Low
Those with high scores are able to initiate tasks and persevere to completion, regardless of boredom or other distractions. They are able to motivate themselves to complete the task at hand.
Those with low scores tend to procrastinate in beginning tasks and are easily discouraged and eager to quit.
E5(EXCITEMENT SEEKER)6.3 ——High
Those who score high on this scale are characterized by a need for excitement and stimulation. They tend to be attracted to bright colors and noisy environments. Excitement seeking is analogous to some aspects of sensation seeking.
Those who score low on this scale show a minimal need for thrills and a preference for a lifestyle that high scorers may find uninspiring.
②Pattern of emotions
N1
N3
N6
E6
5.2
6.6
5.2
4.8
High
Low
N1(ANXIETY)5.2——Average
People with elevated anxiety levels are prone to feelings of apprehension, fear, worry, nervousness, tension, and jitteriness. The scale does not directly assess specific fears or phobias, but individuals with high scores are more likely to experience such fears as well as generalized anxiety.
Those with low scores tend to exhibit calm and relaxed behavior, with a tendency to avoid dwelling on potential negative outcomes.
N3(DEPRESSION)6.6 ——High
This scale is designed to assess individual differences in the tendency to experience depressive affect. High scorers are prone to feelings of guilt, sadness, hopelessness, and loneliness. They are easily discouraged and often depressed.
Low scorers rarely experience such emotions, but they are not necessarily cheerful and upbeat. Instead, these traits are more often associated with extraversion.
N6(VULNERABILITY)5.2——Average
Those who score high on this scale are unable to cope with stress and become dependent, hopeless, or panicked when faced with emergency situations.
In contrast, those who score low perceive themselves as capable of handling difficult situations.
E6(POSITIVE EMOTIONS)4.8——Average
The final aspect of extraversion is the tendency to experience positive emotions, including joy, happiness, love, and excitement. Individuals with high scores on this dimension tend to laugh easily and often, and display a cheerful and optimistic demeanor.
In contrast, those with low scores on this dimension are not necessarily unhappy; they simply exhibit less exuberance and high spirits.
Ⅹ.Value Applied
BACK
The Five Factor Model of Personality has demonstrated a wide range of applied value in various fields of psychology, including clinical, health, developmental, occupational, managerial, and industrial psychology. For example, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Agreeableness have been found to be related to mental health; Extraversion and Openness are two important correlates of industrial and organizational psychology; and Responsibility is closely related to personnel selection. John has conducted research on the relationship between the Big Five personality and adolescent psychological development. His findings indicate that adolescents high in Openness and Responsibility exhibit excellent academic performance, while those low in Responsibility and Agreeableness exhibit more delinquent behavior. Adolescents high in extraversion, low in agreeableness, and low in responsibility often exhibited behavioral problems in conflict with the external world, while adolescents high in neuroticism and low in responsibility often exhibited problems caused by internal conflicts. The Big Five has become the "universal currency of personality psychology. It has been the most active topic of personality research since the 1990s and is one of the best descriptions of basic human traits available.
Bibliography
1.Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.
2.Dolan SL (2006). Stress, Self-Esteem, Health and Work.
3.Cavallera G, Passerini A, Pepe A (2013). "Personality and gender in swimmers in indoor practice at leisure level". Social Behavior and Personality.
4.Poropat AE (March 2009). "A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance". Psychological Bulletin.
https://www.rvvr.cn/mytest_big5viewwxenandroidallsite.aspx?z=202405&q=0&examineeno=10_fa07a71c_202405&bxid=10&m=0&tesi=d48537eca1fe7405fde68c2975a6b4c20a1c98d3&app=1&lang=en